Ip geolocation ecosystem summary – apnic


IP geolocation may be the mapping of the Ip to some geographic location. These details may be used to provide customized encounters to finish-users for example targeted advertisements along with other location specific features. Geolocation providers obtain information from multiple sources, including RIR data, to find out IP geolocation within their services or products, which is often used by individuals who require IP location information. The diagram below illustrates the flow and assortment of IP geolocation data and also the factors that could lead to variations in IP-based geolocation.

You should observe that APNIC’s whois data is among the numerous sources utilized by geolocation providers. It’s not guaranteed that updating Ip records within the APNIC Whois Database will fix the geolocation data inaccuracies.

Correction of IP geolocation

Geolocation information customers and LIR/ISPs are requested to supply updates or corrections straight to geolocation providers. Such updates, and various other data, lead towards the geolocation provider’s proprietary analysis of IP geolocation information. Please be aware that geolocation providers have different update schedules to fix their IP geolocation information. APNIC advises People to accept following steps when confronted with different IP location information within the geolocation provider’s database. Step One. Make sure that the Ip registration information within the APNIC Whois Database is true. Step Two. Submit updates/correction reports straight to the geolocation providers. There are many organizations that offer geolocation services, for example:

  • MaxMind
  • Google support
  • IP2 Location
  • IPligence
  • Ipregistry
  • ipgeolocation.io
  • ipdata.co

If you’re a geolocation provider and also be included to their list, please contact the APNIC Helpdesk. Get more information at APNICs Geolocation FAQs.

Resourse: https://apnic.internet/get-ip/faqs/ip-geolocation-ecosystem-summary/

Cooperation SIG

  • Bryan Munro-Smith: 76% of “organisations” that moved to GDPR whois data masking were of a highly dubious nature – this desperately needs fixed…